banner

IBFed responds to IOSCO consultation report on issues raised by dark liquidity - 10/02/11

10 Feb 2011

IBFed has commented on an IOSCO consultation report on dark liquidity.  In commenting, IBFed has agreed with IOSCO that:

  • conceptually, a distinction needs be drawn between dark pools (i.e. pools of liquidity that provide no pre-trade transparency) and dark orders (i.e. orders for which there is no pre-trade transparency, notwithstanding the level of transparency of the venue where the order is received).
  • both dark pools and dark orders are not a new market feature and that both have existed - in levels that have not been subject to proper measurement - for a good reason, notably, to preserve an adequate level of anonymity for the quote and to execute orders minimising their market impact. Importantly, dark pools and dark orders meet a demand in the market.
  • dark pools and dark orders are currently more prominent due to automation and the use of electronic trading. The increasing notability of dark liquidity is, therefore, a consequence of the advent of technology and broad market innovation.

The IBFed comment is available here.

 
IBFED would like to place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the use of cookies, please see our privacy policy